Connect with us

News

Enjoining order against ‘The King Crab’ restaurant

Published

on

The Colombo Commercial High Court issued two enjoining orders against a restaurant identifying itself as ‘The King Crab,’ following claims of unfair competition by the renowned Sri Lankan restaurant chain Ministry of Crab who was owned by former Sri Lankan Cricket legend duo Mahela Jayawardena and Kumar Sangakkara.

The enjoining orders were issued by Colombo Commercial High Court Judge K.P Fernando after considering a case filed by Crab Corp Pvt ltd against Gourmet Holdings, The King Crab and its Chef Edward Benedict.

Following issuing the orders notices were issued and defendants were ordered to produce their facts before the Court today (23). Senior Counsel Manoj Bandara appearing for the plaintiff Crab Corp Ltd, the registered Sri Lankan entity of Ministry of Crab made submission before the Court that ‘The King Crab’ restaurant was utilising the distinctive yellow and black colour combinations, and most significantly a yellow crab logo against a black background and other business identifiers popularly associated with Ministry of Crab, including specific designs and catchphrases, in their restaurant, menus, social media and other promotions, leading to confusion among customers.

The Counsel brought to the attention of the Court that the said restaurant was also situated at close proximity to the plaintiff’s flagship restaurant at Old Dutch Hospital complex at Colombo Fort, thereby heightening the confusion.

Ministry of Crab, established as a premier dining destination known for its unique Crab centric theme and seafood offerings, has built significant brand equity through its signature logo and vibrant colour palette for over a decade and is one of the only two Sri Lankan restaurants to be listed among the Asia’s 50 Best Restaurants for 8 consecutive years since 2015, putting Sri Lanka in the spotlight on the culinary world map. Ministry of Crab is owned by celebrity Chef Dharshan Munidasa and Sri Lankan cricket legends Mahela Jayawardane and Kumar Sangakkara. A number of other restaurants in the Ministry of Crabs restaurants chain are also operating in the major cities around the world, including Singapore, Shanghai, Chengdu, Manila, Mumbai, and Bangkok.

The Senior Counsel appearing for the plaintiff told Court that the value of the branding of Ministry of Crab extends beyond mere aesthetics, it embodies the restaurant’s reputation for quality and innovation in the culinary scene, and that the actions of the defendants appeared to be an attempt to capitalise on the goodwill and customer base of Ministry of Crab. The plaintiff presented evidence demonstrating that the conduct of the defendants violates principles of unfair competition as outlined in Section 160 of the Intellectual Property Act No. 36 of 2003. On the instructions of the Sudath Perera Associates, a Panel of attorneys including Manoj Bandara with Thidas Herath, Thamali Wijekoon, Anjallie Fonseka appeared for the plaintiff.

(Daily News)

(This story, originally published by Daily News has not been edited by SLM staff)

News

Probe launched over student death at Wayamba National College of Education

Published

on

By

The Ministry of Education (MOE) has launched an urgent investigation into the suicide of a second-year female student at the Wayamba National College of Education in Bingiriya.

The student (24), a resident of Teldeniya, Kandy, was found dead in her dormitory on May 23. Friends and family allege she faced mental distress due to harassment by lecturers.

Students held a silent protest on May 23 calling for immediate action and demanding accountability.

Police say that statements have been recorded from several persons, including lecturers and students, regarding the death.

Continue Reading

News

03 remanded over shooting of Halloluwa’s vehicle

Published

on

By

The Colombo Magistrate’s Court on May 24 ordered to remand 03 suspects over the shooting of Thusitha Halloluwa’s vehicle.

They have been remanded until May 29.

The remanded suspects include the shooter’s wife, who was arrested at a Maharagama housing complex.

Officers from the Colombo Crime Division (CCD), who are investigating the shooting incident further state that the other 02 arrested are the security guard of the housing complex and a person who was traveling with the shooter.

Investigations have also revealed that the security guard of the apartment complex alerted the shooter about the police arrival during the raid, leading the shooter to flee immediately.

The vehicle of Thusitha Halloluwa – the former DG of Public Relations to former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, was shot in Narahenpita on May 17.

Continue Reading

News

Basil Rajapaksa absent from court; bail not revoked

Published

on

By

Matara Magistrate Aruna Buddhadasa recently ordered Basil Rajapaksa – founder of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna and former Finance Minister, to appear before the Matara Magistrate’s Court on November 21.

The Magistrate made the order when he took up an existing case regarding a land in the Eliyakanda area of Matara that was purchased using allegedly illegally earned money of Rs.50 million.The FCID had filed this case against Basil Rajapaksa and 04 other defendants in 2017 over the alleged purchase of a 1.5 acre land in Eliyakanda, Matara under the name of his wife’s sister, using Rs.50 million allegedly obtained through illegal means.

The first suspect in this case is Tissa Galappaththi, the second suspect is Muditha Jayakody, the third suspect is former Minister Basil Rajapaksa, and the fourth suspect is Ayomi Galappaththi, the sister of the former Minister’s wife.The first suspect in this case is Tissa Galappaththi, the second is Muditha Jayakody, the third is former Minister Basil Rajapaksa, and the fourth is Ayomi Galappaththi, the sister of Rajapaksa’s wife.

While the first 02 suspects, who are out on bail, appeared in court, Basil Rajapaksa and Ayomi Galappaththi were absent.

Deputy Solicitor General Lakmini Girihagama, representing the Attorney General’s Department, noted that while Basil had been granted court permission to travel abroad until May 23, he failed to appear without a reasonable excuse and requested that his bail be revoked and a warrant issued.

In defense, President’s Counsel Anil Silva stated that his client had booked return flights for May 18 and 19, but US doctors had advised Rajapaksa against flying for 06 months after he had fallen off a chair, sustaining damage to his neck and nerves.

Girihagama questioned the claim, stating that the X Rays only indicated a neck sprain and a minor muscle strain. Noting that the medical reports were dated March 18, 2025, it was also questioned as to why tickets were booked for May 18 and 19 if doctors had actually advised against flying for 06 months. Therefore, Girihagama called for the court to revoke bail.

President’s Counsel Silva strongly defended his client, rejecting accusations of faking illness, affirming the credibility of US medical reports, and assuring the court of his client’s presence at the next hearing, arguing there is no need for a warrant or revoke bail.

After hearing both sides, Magistrate Aruna Buddhadasa decided not to issue a warrant or revoke bail, instructing that the accused be present on the next court date. The case was postponed to November 21.

(Source: Dinamina)

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Sri Lanka Mirror. All Rights Reserved